Have you ever heard the saying “Thou Protest Too Much?” What that saying implies is that by protesting too much about something, you are in fact showing your true colors about the topic that you are so emotional about.
Same goes for e-mail. When you jump to conclusions or protest too much, you are saying quite a bit more than you probably want to about the kind of person you are — and what you think of others. Here’s an example of how jumping to incorrect conclusions can cause you embarrassment or show that you can’t stop thinking about yourself long enough to see the forest through the trees.
I was contacted by an individual that wanted to do an interview with me with for an article in a big name magazine. I immediately replied and stated I looked forward to working with them on their project. Moments later down comes a second e-mail from this individual.
They had received my automated response that e-mails to this site receive, that states clearly, in caps at the top, that it is just that — an automated response. The autoresponder goes on to explain that due to all the spam, off-line etiquette questions and e-mail from students who want answers to their homework in lieu of reading my site, that only sincere site visitor e-mails will be responded to.
The second e-mail from this person who wanted to interview me was very condescending. They choose to take my autoresponder personally — as an indication of me not knowing WHO they were. Sheesh…
Clearly this person was not asking off-line etiquette questions nor were they a student trying to avoid doing their homework. So why such a visceral reaction? They didn’t read the entire autoresponder — the root of most online misunderstandings — or they wouldn’t have jumped to this conclusion. They choose to put the message in the context of “She may not respond to ME? The nerve!”
This is a perfect example of how someone can read into an e-mail what isn’t there or intended. By reading more into it than the words actually state. By putting their ego into a message that had nothing to do with them.
There was no reason to jump to the conclusion they did. They choose to flex their ego in a way that certainly didn’t leave them in an attractive light. I won’t respond in kind. I’ll just leave it out there as a learning experience.
So don’t jump to conclusions or make assumptions above the words actually typed. Be very careful to not read meaning or intent that is the specifically clearly implied. If ever in doubt as to someone’s aim or purpose, just ask! By doing so you’ll avoid unnecessary misunderstandings or poor perceptions. I’ll close with another saying. “Better safe than sorry.”
No related posts.
![[Take The Email Etiquette Pledge]](http://www.emailetiquettepledge.com/ee-rev-medium.jpg)
![[Email Etiquette Made Easy!]](http://www.netmanners.com/images/email-etiquette-made-easy-100.jpg)


A wise Proverb once stated: “When anyone is replying to a matter before he hears it, that is foolishness on his part and a humiliation.”
It’s amazing the amount of miscommunicated thoughts, emotions and feelings which take place on a daily basis. Husbands and wives who’ve been married for many years experience this. Best friends at times also committ this folly. One possible reason why persons jump to conclusions is that what one thinks is true in their own mind is made in the absense of proof to the contrary. Usually what indicts a person is not overwhelming evidence but rather a lack of it. As G.H. Lewis once stated: “We never assume that which is incapable of proof”.
Emails unfortnately add to this dilemma. What is lacking in email are inflections of tone and timber. It is difficult to “read” emotions or feelings with short constructed emails. At least with books and novels feelings and motives are allowed to mature and develop so that a clear picture can be seen yet emails afford us no such opportunity.
When in doubt of how something will be interpreted – make a phone call or make a personal visit if at all possible. Emails cannot properly convey true depth of meaning without allowing room for misunderstandings.
Is it ego that cause someone to read into an e-mail what isn’t there? It’s perhaps one of many reasons. But again, it would be unfair for us to truly guess in the absense of more evidence.
Hey, Alex!
Thanks for taking the time to type such a thoughtful and insightful commentary. Gives us all something more to think about!
Thanks!
Judith
NetManners.com